The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing

The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing

Blog Article

Также здесь представлены профилактических мерах, актуальных подходах и рекомендациях специалистов.

Delay in recording confessional statement is probably not treated fatal on the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

4.  It's been noticed by this Court that there is actually a delay of at some point in the registration of FIR which has not been explained via the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness with the alleged occurrence and the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners has been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred being the real brothers from the deceased but they did not respond in the least on the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making on the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on so many events that extra judicial confession of an accused can be a weak kind of evidence which may very well be manoeuvred with the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution is likewise depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning presence of some light on the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other with a motorcycle at 4.

The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed inside the bank and due to the fact only the appellants were posted at the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )

ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety days. In the event the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then solution the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety times for that department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided with the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.

States also typically have courts that handle only a specific subset of legal matters, which include family law and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common legislation, is the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending over the relationship between the deciding court as well as precedent, case law may very well be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals with the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) is not really strictly bound to Adhere to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by 1 district court in New York is not really binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning might help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions because of the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

In almost any society, the enforcement of regulation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. Among the list of most major crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 of your Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is very important to be certain justice prevails.

department concerned shall offer the complete set of ACRs on the concerned officer to DPC very well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent plus the case under appeal, Probably overruling the previous case regulation by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may perhaps occur several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first in the High Court of Justice, later of the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his progress in the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.

Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses including self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may perhaps cause reduced charges or acquittal.

1. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence as well as the separation of powers.

Try to find websites affiliated with respected legal institutions or organizations. Confirm the information against other sources when feasible.

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are recognized by executive agencies based on here statutes.